Back to the Handbook
Foundations

Materiality

Information is material if omitting or misstating it could reasonably influence the decisions of users of the financial statements.

Federalbookkeepingfundamentalsjudgmentaudit
Last reviewed April 16, 2026

Definition

Materiality is a threshold, not a precision target. Items that would change a reasonable reader's conclusions must be recorded and disclosed accurately. Items that are too small to affect any decision can be handled pragmatically: grouped, estimated, or expensed immediately. Materiality is judged by both size (quantitative) and nature (qualitative). A small dollar error involving fraud or a related-party transaction may be material even when the amount is trivial.

Key rules

  • Quantitative benchmarks used in practice (these are professional judgment guides, not GAAP rules):
  • Qualitative materiality: related-party transactions, regulatory non-compliance, illegal acts, covenant breaches, and items that turn a profit into a loss (or vice versa) are material regardless of size.
  • Performance materiality (audit): a smaller working threshold, usually 50 to 75 percent of overall materiality, used to reduce aggregation risk.
  • Materiality is set at the planning stage and revisited if new information emerges.
  • Small CCPCs: the threshold is often low in absolute terms (a few hundred dollars). This is useful when deciding whether to capitalize a minor asset or expense it.

Example

A one-person BC corporation has pre-tax income of $90,000 and revenue of $160,000. Using 5% of pre-tax income yields an overall materiality of approximately $4,500. Performance materiality at 75% is about $3,400.

Overall materiality (planning):     $4,500
Performance materiality:            $3,400
Trivial-error threshold (for pass): $   225 (5% of overall)

A $300 receipt coding error would be noted but passed. A $150 unrecorded related-party transaction with the shareholder's spouse would still be disclosed because the nature is material.

Many one-person corporations only need a compilation engagement (Notice to Reader). In that case, formal materiality is not set, but reasonable judgment is still required. See .

Common mistakes

  • Applying a rigid dollar threshold from a prior year without recomputing it when income, revenue, or assets change materially.
  • Ignoring qualitative materiality. Related-party items, management compensation, and loan covenants require precise disclosure regardless of size.
  • Rounding aggressively so that individually immaterial errors accumulate into a material misstatement.
  • Capitalizing every $200 item "because the rule is $500." Materiality allows expensing small capital items; CRA permits this when consistently applied.
  • Treating materiality as an audit-only concept. Preparers use it every day when deciding what to track separately.

Materiality works alongside and the assumption to shape professional judgment. It also sets the tone for engagements and determines what ends up in the .

Authority

  • CPA Canada Handbook. Accounting Part II (ASPE) Section 1000, Financial Statement Concepts
  • CPA Canada Handbook. Assurance CAS 320, Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit
  • CPA Canada Handbook. Assurance CSRE 2400, Engagements to Review Historical Financial Statements

See also

Related entries

This entry is for general reference. It does not constitute professional tax advice. Consult a qualified Canadian accountant for your specific situation.